Zebracat Review 2026: Is the 7-Day Refund Real?
Our verdict
Zebracat is a genuinely broad studio at a competitive price, and almost everything about it holds up under checking: the yearly discount is a real 41.0% / 40.4% / 40.2% against a badge that only claims 40%, the entry tier bundles 15 videos, 350 generative AI credits, 170+ languages, avatars, a stock library and a publishing calendar, Super Cat cuts the price of a credit 35.9% while quadrupling the allowance, every tier can be bought monthly, and the seller is a named German UG with a register number whose Terms state plainly that you retain all rights to your content. What decides the purchase is one contradiction: the pricing page prints 7-day money-back guarantee and Didn't download any video? Get a full refund within 7 days, while the Terms and Conditions say No refunds will be provided for already paid subscription periods — and downloading the video is the one condition the guarantee excludes. Two further facts sit on top of it: no per-model rate is published for the 350/1,400/3,600 generative AI credits the plans are priced around, so a tier above the bottom one cannot be costed before paying; and the free plan, the only risk-free way in, appears nowhere on the pricing page. The independent record is thin and dated rather than bad — Trustpilot 4.4 from 298 reviews with only 11 in the last 12 months, against a vendor badge reading 4.7. 3.9 is the score for buyer risk once the four dimensions, which average 4.0, meet a guarantee the contract does not contain.
- Price basis: Cat Mode $39 monthly or $23 billed yearly ($276/year) for 15 videos and 350 generative AI credits a month; Super Cat $99/$59 for 40 and 1,400; Unlimited Cat $199/$119 for unlimited and 3,600. The yearly saving is 41.0% / 40.4% / 40.2% (calculated) against a badge that claims Save 40%
- The real divide: the pricing page prints a 7-day money-back guarantee for anyone who Did not download any video, while /terms-and-conditions says No refunds will be provided for already paid subscription periods — the advertised exit and the contract cannot both govern the same purchase
- Not published anywhere the vendor controls: a per-model rate for the 350/1,400/3,600 generative AI credits, so how many videos of VEO3, Kling, Seedance, PixVerse or Sora2 a tier actually buys cannot be computed before paying
Last updated Pricing verified
Zebracat's pricing page prints 7-day money-back guarantee and, directly underneath, Didn't download any video? Get a full refund within 7 days. The Terms and Conditions print No refunds will be provided for already paid subscription periods. The advertised exit and the contract cannot both be true — and the one thing that voids the guarantee is downloading the video you paid for. The prices themselves check out: $39/$99/$199 monthly against $23/$59/$119 billed yearly is 40–41% off.
What it does well
The yearly discount is real, and the badge understates it. One division settles the first question
a buyer has about any subscription tool that advertises a saving. Cat Mode is $39 a month, or $23
a month billed yearly at $276 a year, which is 41.0% off (calculated). Super Cat is 40.4% and
Unlimited Cat 40.2%. The badge on the page claims only Save 40%, and the navigation item reads
Pricing 40% OFF, so the marketing is, if anything, conservative. Most tools on this site round the
other way.
What the entry price buys is a pipeline rather than a generator. Cat Mode includes 15 videos / mo, 350 generative AI credits / mo, Generative video enabled, Limited AI Avatars, Standard AI voices (170+ languages), Basic stock clips & music, 1 Brand Kit and Fast processing. The
comparison table repeats 170+ Languages on all four tiers and prints 1080p export for each of
them. Around the generator sit a template gallery, Brand Kits, a content calendar, publishing and
scheduling to social platforms and YouTube, an API link and an MCP link — the app itself, opened
in a logged-in free account, ships Prompt guide, Templates, AI Avatars, Voice Cloning, My Brand Brain, Asset Library, Analytics, Content Calendar and Your Videos as separate
destinations. The in-app plan list names the generative models as VEO3, Kling 2.5 pro, Seedance,
PixVerse, Sora2.
Super Cat is the step worth paying for, and the arithmetic says so. $59 a month billed yearly
against Cat Mode’s $23 is 2.57x the price for 2.67x the videos (40 against 15) and
4x the credits (1,400 against 350). The unit price of a credit falls from $0.0657 to
$0.0421, a 35.9% cut (calculated), and the tier unlocks 5 custom avatars, 5 voice clones /mo,
120+ premium AI avatars, Premium AI voices, Translate videos into 25+ languages, the Full stock & music library and 5 Brand Kits. Per video the gap is mild — $1.53 against $1.48 — which tells
you what the entry tier is really short of: credits, not video slots.
The seller is identifiable, which is not a given in this category. The imprint names Zebracat AI
UG (haftungsbeschränkt), c/o Merantix AI Campus Berlin, Max-Urich-Straße 3, 13355 Berlin,
represented by Michael Baumgartner and Mohammadreza Zolfaghari, with Registry Court: Berlin Charlottenburg, Commercial Register No. HRB 233288 B. The Terms add GDPR commitments — access,
correction, deletion, restriction, portability and objection — plus 30 days’ notice before
material changes, and they resolve disputes by informal contact first rather than by mandatory
arbitration.
On ownership the contract is unusually clear for this category. Most tools here either say nothing about what you generate or bury it. These Terms say, in one sentence: “You grant us the right to use, modify, and distribute such content. You retain all rights to your content and are responsible for its legality, reliability, and appropriateness.” You keep the rights; you grant the vendor a broad licence to use, modify and distribute. That is worth reading carefully before a client deliverable, but it is a real answer rather than silence.
Nothing forces a year, and the cheapest way in needs no card. Every tier offers a monthly plan, the
billing switch sits on the pricing page rather than behind a sales call, and the Terms say you can
cancel from the billing page. The signup screen promises No Credit Card Required, and the sidebar of
a logged-in free account carries a live counter: Left this period: 1 video · 10 AI credits, read
8 October 2026.
Pricing: three tiers, and two tabs you have to switch yourself
The pricing page loads with the yearly tab already selected. That is worth knowing before you read a number off it, because the figure you see first is the annualised one.
| Plan, 8 Oct 2026 | Monthly | Billed yearly | Yearly total | Discount | Videos / mo | Generative credits / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cat Mode | $39 | $23 | $276 | 41.0% | 15 | 350 |
| Super Cat | $99 | $59 | $708 | 40.4% | 40 | 1,400 |
| Unlimited Cat | $199 | $119 | $1,428 | 40.2% | Unlimited | 3,600 |
| Enterprise | $599+ | Custom | Custom | — | Unlimited | Custom |
The page also prints the tier limits that decide most of the smaller questions: video length is
2 min on Cat Mode and 5 min on the other three; free edits per video are 3 / 3 / 5 / Unlimited;
export resolution is 1080p on all four; custom avatars are a cross on Cat Mode, then 5 / mo,
10 / mo and Unlimited; and Translate your Video is a cross on Cat Mode and included above it.
The tier question is answered by the credit, not by the video count. Divide each yearly-billed
monthly price by the credits it includes and the ladder becomes visible: $23 ÷ 350 is $0.0657 a
credit, $59 ÷ 1,400 is $0.0421, and $119 ÷ 3,600 is $0.0331 (all calculated). Cat Mode is
the most expensive credit on the page, and Super Cat is the step where the unit price actually
moves — 35.9% down, for 2.57x the money. Unlimited Cat is then a gentler 21.6% improvement on Super
Cat with unlimited videos attached.
Both paid creative tiers also carry an Additional Generative Minutes control, whose untouched
state reads 0 min and 0 /mo. Generative time is therefore a second meter running alongside the
credits — and like the credits, it carries no published unit price on this page.
Open the pricing page and click both tabs before you decide. The tab it selects for you is the yearly one, and the monthly number is the one that tells you what a month actually costs.
The 7-day guarantee, and the contract that does not contain it
The pricing page carries a guarantee block: 7-day money-back guarantee, and beneath it
Didn't download any video? Get a full refund within 7 days.
The Terms and Conditions (/terms-and-conditions, read 8 October 2026), under Subscriptions and
Billing, carry this sentence: No refunds will be provided for already paid subscription periods. The same section adds that subscriptions automatically renew unless canceled, that
cancellation happens on the billing page, and that the vendor “reserve[s] the right to modify
subscription fees, with reasonable prior notice”, with continued use counting as agreement.
Those two documents cannot both govern the same purchase, and the guarantee is written for a buyer who has not used the product. The refund is offered to someone who “didn’t download any video” — so the act of downloading the video you paid for is precisely what removes the promise. Everything else in the guarantee block holds up: the checkout accepts Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Discover, JCB, UnionPay, Diners Club, Google Pay, Apple Pay and PayPal, and there is no setup fee anywhere in sight. The problem is not the payment plumbing; it is that the exit advertised on the pricing page is not the exit described in the contract.
This review will not guess which one the vendor intends to honour. Ask support, in writing, which policy applies to your account, and keep the reply — that is the only reliable answer, and it is free to obtain before you pay. The document also contains no reference to a 14-day withdrawal right anywhere, despite a Berlin-registered seller and German governing law.
What a generative credit buys is not published
Every tier is priced around a credit allowance: 350, 1,400 and 3,600 generative AI credits a
month, reaching VEO3, Kling 2.5 pro, Seedance, PixVerse and Sora2 by the vendor’s own plan list.
What is missing is the rate card. No per-model credit cost appears on the pricing page, in the
in-app plan list, or in the Terms and Conditions (all read 8 October 2026).
The only published breakdown that could be found is dated 25 May 2024, in an AppSumo question where a customer posted the rates and a Zebracat founder replied the same day:
| Job, per the May 2024 AppSumo breakdown | Credits per minute |
|---|---|
| Stock media (video clips, music) | Free, unlimited minutes |
| Standard AI Voice | 1 |
| Ultra Realistic AI Voices | 4 |
| AI Visuals — image-based videos | 5 |
| AI Visuals — infinite zoom | 8 |
| AI Script Writing from a prompt or URL | 0.5 |
| Using your own footage | 1 per video minute |
| First export of each video | Free |
| Each additional export | 1 |
The founder’s two direct answers in that thread are still useful today: videos shorter than a minute are pro-rated rather than rounded up to a full minute, and credits are shared across the whole account regardless of how many Brand Kits it holds. But the table describes a 2024 credit system built around voices, footage and stock media — not the generative credits that today’s plans are priced in and that the plan lists tie to Veo 3, Kling, Seedance, PixVerse and Sora2.
The practical consequence: the jump from $23 to $59 cannot be evaluated from the vendor’s own
numbers. You are told you get four times the credits; you are not told what a credit buys. Ask
support for the current per-model rates in writing, or treat the first month as a measurement. If the
answer comes back vague, that is itself the answer — the entry tier at $23 is cheap enough to
measure with, and the $119 tier is not.
Where the vendor’s own pages disagree
Three claims differ between the vendor’s own surfaces, and all three are checkable in a few minutes.
| Claim | One source | The other source |
|---|---|---|
| Languages | 170+ Languages — pricing page and comparison table | Standard AI voices (175+ languages) — the plan list inside the app |
| Unlimited Cat’s export and length | 4K video rendering and Longer videos — up to 10 minutes — in-app plan list | 1080p export and a 5 min length limit for every tier including Enterprise — public comparison table |
| Cat Mode’s video length | Any length - each video counts as one. — tooltip on the card’s 15 videos / mo line | Video Length Limit: 2 min — the comparison table two screens down on the same page |
This review does not decide which of each pair is operative, and a reader should not assume the
more generous one. What can be said is that Unlimited Cat is sold at $119 a month in the app on the
strength of 4K rendering and ten-minute videos, while the public comparison table promises neither to
any tier at any price — and that a buyer whose reason for upgrading is 4K or a ten-minute video should
have that in writing before paying for it.
One third-party table lines up with the stricter reading of the length limit. A competing vendor’s
own comparison post, published 29 September 2026 with its sponsorship disclosed in the post itself,
lists Zebracat as $39/mo with No, 2 min on the entry plan. That is a competitor’s marketing table
rather than user testimony, and it cannot settle the question — but it is an outside source agreeing
with the 2 min the comparison table prints, and not with the tooltip that says Any length.
The public record: 4.4 on Trustpilot, 4.7 in the vendor’s badge
Read directly on 8 October 2026, the Trustpilot profile for zebracat.ai shows a
TrustScore of 4.4 from 298 reviews, on a profile claimed May 2024. The printed distribution is
5-star 240 (80%) · 4-star 39 (13%) · 3-star 5 (2%) · 2-star 3 · 1-star 11, which sums to exactly
298 and works out to a raw mean of 4.66 (calculated). The gap between 4.66 and the 4.4 TrustScore
is Trustpilot’s own weighting, not a disagreement about the counts.
Three annotations on that profile matter more than the number:
11 reviews in the last 12 months— a 298-review base that is overwhelmingly from 2024, which is when the product was being launched and discounted.This company hasn't invited customers recently, so reviews may not be representativeHasn't replied to negative reviews
The vendor’s own footer prints 4.7/5 next to Trustpilot, 4.8/5 next to G2 and 4.9/5
next to Capterra, and the affiliate page repeats all three. The Capterra figure could not be
independently verified — that page returns a bot challenge to a normal request — and the G2 figure
was not verified either. The Trustpilot figure was, and it is 4.4, not 4.7: the badge is
defensible only as a rounded raw mean, which is not what a badge implies.
One more corporate detail is worth recording because a procurement review will hit it. The imprint
gives Max-Urich-Straße 3, 13355 Berlin; the contact block on the claimed Trustpilot profile gives
Lohmühlenstraße 65, 12435, Berlin with michael@zebracat.ai. Two Berlin addresses is not a
scandal — companies move — but it is the kind of thing to reconcile before you file an invoice.
On AppSumo, where Zebracat ran a lifetime deal, the listing’s own rating is 3.96 from 135 reviews and the deal now shows as Sold out. Its question feed is the most substantive user testimony that exists for this product, and it is mostly negative: a recent question states that advanced AI scenes “now require separate generative AI credits, which must be purchased independently”; another reports word counts and video lengths reduced from “6,000 words and 8-10 minute videos” to “a little over 1,000 words and 360 second videos”; another is titled Bait and switch about a changed credit structure; another asks why a paid Level 2 licence can no longer create videos at all. Those are lifetime-deal customers on a different contract from the subscriptions sold today, and this review records them as such — but a buyer should know that the longest-standing customers of this product are the ones complaining that their allowances were cut after purchase, and that nothing in the current Terms prevents the allowances in the plans above from being rewritten the same way.
Reddit: one first-hand mention, and a launch the vendor ran itself
Reddit was searched on 8 October 2026 through one channel, in 23 query variants plus subreddit-scoped searches. The channel was verified working first: the same commands return 17 posts for a comparable hosting tool and a dense thread list for a comparable clipping tool. Zebracat returns 30 unique posts, and they decompose almost entirely into four kinds — none of which is a review:
- The launch was run by the company. In June 2024 the same account posted the Product Hunt launch to r/growmybusiness, r/SaaS, r/thesidehustle, r/Entrepreneurs and r/SideProject, linking the product, the poster’s LinkedIn profile and Product Hunt together. The most-upvoted comment on the largest of those threads (post score 1, 25 reported comments) is “Oh look another shitty goddamn AI tool no one asked for.” Nothing in any of those comment threads describes using the product. Asked on r/thesidehustle whether the post was AI-written, the poster answered: “Yes i asked AI to help polish my text! but what’s wrong with that?”
- The “reviews” are affiliate seeding. One account posted a YouTube “Zebracat Review” to four
subreddits in a single day; every copy has 0–1 upvotes, and the r/ChatGPT copy’s only comment is the
AutoModerator bot. Two further posts carry other affiliates’ tracking parameters on the signup
URL —
?via=donald-gand?via=galaxai— and others are promo-code landing pages. - The official subreddit is empty. r/zebracat, opened by a third account in July 2025, contains exactly two posts, both vendor-side, 1 upvote and 0 comments each — the welcome post literally invites you to “Browse the (currently empty!) feed.”
- One genuine user mention exists, and it is about captions. In June 2025, answering “What did you use to add captions in the video?” on r/youtube, a user replied: “Hey thanks for that, I used a website called Zebracat”. It is the only clean first-hand usage statement in the entire dataset, it says nothing about price, output quality, refunds or support — and the same account was promoting its own channel in that thread, so seeding cannot be fully excluded.
What is not there is the finding. No post or comment from a customer discusses what Zebracat
costs, which plan they bought, whether it was worth it, a refund, a chargeback, a cancellation, or the
quality of what it produced. Searches for zebracat refund, zebracat billing and zebracat scam
returned nothing from a customer; the one “scam” hit is a different company — “Zebracat AI
Publicity”, an unrelated TV-advert scheme in Gurgaon, India — and is flagged here so that no reader
misattributes it. Subreddit-scoped searches of nine relevant communities (r/NewTubers, r/VideoEditing,
r/artificial, r/Entrepreneur, r/SmallBusiness, r/podcasting, r/AIVideo, r/marketing, r/YouTubers)
returned zero rows each, and a “what AI tools are we using” thread in r/SocialMediaManagers where
you would expect the name to appear does not mention it. The highest score on any Zebracat post found
is 3.
For a tool whose homepage claims 50 000+ Creators, Business Owners and Marketers, that is a
materially thinner community footprint than its direct competitors carry — Pollo AI’s Trustpilot
profile holds 6K reviews and Fliki’s 3K against Zebracat’s 298. Two limits on this section are
stated rather than papered over: the Reddit reader returned fewer comment nodes than Reddit’s own
comment counts on the busiest threads (6 rows against a reported 25 on the main launch post), and
post-search does not reach a name-drop buried inside the comments of an unrelated thread. So this
review claims an absence of independent discussion in the posts it could reach, not proof that none
exists anywhere. Every judgement below rests on the vendor’s own documents and the two review
platforms above rather than on user testimony, and the absence of complaint is not evidence of
satisfaction.
Who should not buy Zebracat
Do not subscribe if the 7-day guarantee is what makes it safe. The pricing page prints it, the Terms contradict it, and the condition attached to it is that you have not downloaded a video.
Do not buy Unlimited Cat for 4K or ten-minute videos until the vendor confirms in writing which of its own pages applies. The app advertises both; the comparison table promises neither to any tier.
Do not buy a tier above Cat Mode until you know what a credit costs. Four times the credits is only worth 2.57x the money if you know what the credits buy, and nothing the vendor publishes tells you.
Do not expect an SLA or a large claim. There is no service-level agreement anywhere on the site,
and liability is capped at the lesser of $100 or the fees paid in the previous 12 months.
Do not treat the review badges as a sample. 4.7 is the vendor’s own number against an actual 4.4, only 11 of 298 Trustpilot reviews are from the last year, and Trustpilot itself notes the company has not replied to negative reviews.
And if you need a deep, current independent record before buying, there is one here only in the sense that there is none — see the section above.
The offer inside the app is better than the price on the page
One finding is worth its own section because it is directly actionable: the public pricing page and the app quote different prices for the same plans.
Opened in a logged-in free account on 8 October 2026, the upgrade screen reads Go premium with your personal 55% off, with a countdown running next to it — observed at 02:48:47 on first read
and 02:46:36 a few minutes later, so it is a live timer of roughly three hours, not a static
banner. The prices behind it are:
| Plan | Public page, billed yearly | In-app offer, billed yearly | Public monthly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cat Mode | $23 | $17 | $39 |
| Super Cat | $59 | $44 | $99 |
| Unlimited Cat | $119 | $89 | $199 |
The discount arithmetic behind the offer is internally consistent: 55% of the monthly price times
twelve is exactly the saving printed ($257, $653 and $1,313), so this is a real price rather than
a struck-through anchor. The offer is account-specific and time-boxed, so it may not be running for
you and may not be running when you read this — which is precisely why the order of operations
matters. Create the free account first and look at the upgrade screen before paying the published
rate.
How it scores
Features is a 4.5. The breadth is real, and it is the reason to consider the product rather than
one of the single-purpose generators it competes with: 170+ languages, avatars and custom avatars,
voice cloning, video translation with lip-sync, stock clips and music, Brand Kits, templates, a
content calendar that publishes and schedules to social platforms and YouTube, an API and an MCP
endpoint, and generative access to VEO3, Kling 2.5 pro, Seedance, PixVerse and Sora2. The half point
comes off for the small frontier-model allowances at the entry tiers and for a credit whose value is
unpublished.
Ease of use is a 4.0. The studio is genuinely guided: prompt presets for product, educational,
blog-to-video and UGC-style ads; a template gallery; a Brand Brain; and a video-settings dialog that
holds aspect ratio, language and length in one place. The mark comes off for working out what you
bought. The same page prints Cat Mode’s length limit twice, as Any length and 2 min; the top
tier’s resolution and maximum length depend on which of the vendor’s surfaces you read; and the entry
allowance is published only after you create an account. The app is easy; the specifications are
not.
Value is a 4.0. $23 a month billed yearly for 15 videos, 350 generative credits, 170+
languages, avatars, voice cloning and a publishing pipeline is competitive in this category, and
$59 on Super Cat is a rare case of the more expensive tier being the better unit price. The mark
comes off because the meter you will actually collide with — generative credits — has no published
price per model, so the value of anything above the entry tier cannot be calculated from the vendor’s
own numbers.
Support is a 3.5. In its favour: a chat widget, a notification centre, a help centre, a contact
address, and a founder who answers customer questions on AppSumo. Against it: Trustpilot annotates
the claimed profile Hasn't replied to negative reviews, and the review base it would be replying
to is a year old. The channel exists; the track record does not.
The four dimensions average 4.0 and the overall rating is 3.9. The 0.1 gap is deliberate. The four dimensions score the product, and the product is good. The overall score carries the two facts that decide the purchase instead: a money-back guarantee the contract does not contain, and a credit meter with no published price.
Pros
- The yearly discount is real and slightly understated: $39/$99/$199 monthly against $23/$59/$119 billed yearly is 41.0% / 40.4% / 40.2% off (calculated), against a badge claiming only Save 40%
- One subscription covers a pipeline rather than a generator: 170+ languages, avatars, custom avatars, voice cloning, translation with lip-sync, stock clips and music, Brand Kits, templates, a publishing calendar, plus API and MCP access
- Entry cost is low on the yearly cycle: Cat Mode is $276 a year for 15 videos a month — about $1.53 each — with 350 generative AI credits included
- Cat Mode to Super Cat is the step worth paying for: $59 a month billed yearly buys 2.67x the videos and 4x the credits, and cuts the credit price 35.9% from $0.0657 to $0.0421 (calculated)
- Every tier can be bought monthly and cancellation is self-service from the billing page, so nothing forces a year of commitment
- A free account needs no credit card, which makes it the cheapest way to find out whether the studio fits
- The seller is a real, identifiable company: Zebracat AI UG (haftungsbeschränkt) in Berlin, register HRB 233288 B at Charlottenburg, two named directors, a published imprint and GDPR commitments in the Terms
- The contract is unusually clear on output ownership for this category — You retain all rights to your content — and gives 30 days notice before material changes with informal dispute resolution rather than mandatory arbitration
- A logged-in free account was quoted a better price than the public page: a personalised 55% off with a running countdown, so create the account before paying the published rate
Cons
- The 7-day money-back guarantee is contradicted by the contract: the pricing page prints Get a full refund within 7 days for anyone who Did not download any video, while the Terms say No refunds will be provided for already paid subscription periods — and downloading the video is the one condition that removes the guarantee
- What a generative AI credit buys is not published: the tiers sell 350/1,400/3,600 credits for VEO3, Kling, Seedance, PixVerse and Sora2, but no per-model rate appears on the pricing page, in the plan list or in the Terms, so nothing above the entry tier can be costed from the vendor numbers
- The vendor pages disagree about what you are buying: 4K and up to 10 minutes in the app against 1080p and 5 min in the public comparison table, 175+ languages in the app against 170+ on the site, and Cat Mode length printed as both Any length and 2 min on one page
- The free plan is undocumented: the pricing page lists no free tier and the signup screen promises only No Credit Card Required, so the allowance is visible only after creating an account
- The independent record is thin and dated: Trustpilot is 4.4 from 298 reviews with only 11 in the last 12 months and annotations reading This company has not invited customers recently and Has not replied to negative reviews, while the vendor badge reads 4.7
- The exit terms are thin: subscriptions auto-renew unless cancelled from the billing page, the Terms allow fee changes with prior notice, there is no SLA anywhere, and liability is capped at the lesser of $100 or 12 months of fees
Frequently asked questions
Is Zebracat worth it?
It is a broad, well-priced studio and it competes on features rather than on a single model. $23 a
month billed yearly buys 15 videos, 350 generative credits, 170+ languages, avatars, voice cloning, a
template gallery, a publishing calendar and API and MCP access, and $59 on Super Cat cuts the unit
price of a credit by 35.9%. Whether it is worth it for you turns on two things this review could not
resolve from the vendor’s documents: which refund policy applies to your account, and what a
generative credit costs per model. Ask both before you pay.
What is the catch with the 7-day money-back guarantee?
The pricing page prints 7-day money-back guarantee and Didn't download any video? Get a full refund within 7 days. The Terms and Conditions print No refunds will be provided for already paid subscription periods. Both are live on the same domain, and the guarantee as written is available
only to a buyer who has not downloaded a video — which is the thing you bought the subscription to do.
Get the applicable policy in writing from support.
How much does Zebracat cost?
Cat Mode: $39 monthly, or $23 a month billed yearly at $276 a year. Super Cat: $99 / $59
($708 a year). Unlimited Cat: $199 / $119 ($1,428 a year). Enterprise: $599+ a month,
quoted through Talk to Sales. The pricing page loads on the yearly tab.
Is there a free trial or a free plan?
There is a free account, and the signup screen’s only promise is No Credit Card Required. The
pricing page lists no free tier at all, so the allowance is not published before you sign up; a
logged-in free account read Left this period: 1 video · 10 AI credits on 8 October 2026. There is no
time-limited trial of the paid tiers — the 7-day money-back guarantee on the pricing page is the
only stated exit.
How many videos do 350 generative AI credits buy?
Not published. The tiers sell 350, 1,400 and 3,600 generative AI credits a month reaching VEO3,
Kling 2.5 pro, Seedance, PixVerse and Sora2, but no per-model credit rate appears on the pricing page,
in the plan list or in the Terms. The only public breakdown is from May 2024 and describes the
older credit system; a Zebracat founder confirmed in that thread that sub-minute videos are pro-rated
and that credits are shared across the whole account.
Does Zebracat really render 4K and make 10-minute videos?
It depends which of the vendor’s pages you read. The plan list inside the app advertises 4K video rendering and Longer videos — up to 10 minutes on Unlimited Cat. The public comparison table prints
1080p export and a 5 min video length limit for all four tiers, Enterprise included. Confirm it in
writing before paying $119 a month for that reason.
Do I own the videos Zebracat makes?
The Terms say: “You grant us the right to use, modify, and distribute such content. You retain all rights to your content.” You keep ownership and grant the vendor a licence to use, modify and distribute. That is clearer than most tools in this category, and worth reading in full before a client deliverable.
Can I get a discount?
Possibly a large one — but not from the public page. A logged-in free account was offered a
personalised 55% off with a running countdown, which put Cat Mode at $17, Super Cat at $44 and
Unlimited Cat at $89 a month billed yearly, against the public $23 / $59 / $119. Create the free
account first and check the upgrade screen.
The bottom line
Zebracat is a real, broad studio at a fair price, and the parts of it that can be checked mostly
check out: the yearly discount is a genuine 41.0% rather than a badge; $23 a month billed yearly
buys 15 videos, 350 generative credits, 170+ languages, avatars, voice cloning and a publishing
calendar; $59 on Super Cat cuts the price of a credit by 35.9%; every tier can be bought
monthly; the seller is a named German UG with a register number; and the Terms state plainly that
you retain all rights to your content.
What decides the purchase is one contradiction and one omission. The pricing page promises a
7-day money-back guarantee to anyone who has not downloaded a video, and the Terms say
already-paid subscription periods are not refunded — while downloading the video is exactly what
you are paying for. And the 350 / 1,400 / 3,600 generative credits that every tier is priced
around have no published rate, so the tiers above the cheapest cannot be costed from the vendor’s
own numbers. Add an independent record that is thin and a year old, and 3.9 is the score for buyer
risk rather than for the product — the four dimensions average 4.0.
So do three things before you pay:
- Create the free account first and look at the upgrade screen. A logged-in free account was
quoted a personalised
55% off—$17 / $44 / $89a month billed yearly against the public$23 / $59 / $119— with a countdown running. Check whether it is on for you before paying the published rate. - Get two answers in writing: which refund policy applies to your account, and what each generative model costs in credits. If either answer is vague, buy monthly rather than yearly.
- Choose between Cat Mode and Super Cat, not above them. Super Cat is the only step where the unit price drops sharply, and it is the entry tier in everything but name if you need translation, custom avatars or voice cloning.
Prices and terms were read on 8 October 2026 from zebracat.ai’s pricing page and comparison table, the affiliate page, the affiliate Agreement, the Terms and Conditions, the imprint, a logged-in free account in the studio app, the logged-in Rewardful portal, the Trustpilot profile, the AppSumo listing and the public Reddit record; the percentages and per-credit figures are calculated here. Verify the live pages before paying. Check the current Zebracat pricing.
The tier-by-tier frontmatter, the full plan highlights and the affiliate terms behind this recommendation are on the Zebracat tool page.